By JANE GLENN HAAS
Women view Hillary Clinton more favorably than men do, but she still faces skepticism among some women, especially those who are older and those who are married, according to the latest New York Times/CBS News poll.
Winning the support of women, who made up 54 percent of voters in the last presidential election, is important to Hillary.
But what’s with this “leadership” thing?
Not to mention this “woman” thing?
Voters say she’s forceful, courageous and strong. They also say she’s a “phony” and “harsh and cold.”
Toughest on Hillary are other women.
Does she have what it takes to face down our enemies, win respect of world leaders, send troops to battle if necessary, keep the country safe from terrorists?
Or, because she’s a woman, should she be spending her time doing good works, like comforting the afflicted, visiting the sick, sheltering the orphaned children.
Honestly, do women have “the right stuff” to do a “man’s job?” Why do they want a “man’s job” anyway?
She was “right” to stay with Bill or she was “wrong.” She’s a “woman’s libber” or a “positive role model.”
Maybe, even, she’s a lesbian?
You think?
A year ago, there were whispers about Hillary being gay. There also were whispers about Condi Rice being gay. And at the same time, Law and Order, the television series, did an episode about a woman CEO who murdered a colleague because he found out she was gay and was going to out her.
The hidden message: Women who crave leadership are exhibiting masculine tendencies so they can’t be “real” women. They must be lesbian.
Great Britain, India, Israel, Germany – to name a few – have had women in top leadership positions but we can’t seem to make the leap.
Check out the “news” section of this web site for some current thinking on women in leadership roles in this country.
Not that our negative attitude toward women in politics is confined simply to presidential candidates.
Saturday, the Wall Street Journal had a cover story about Elizabeth Edwards, who has stage four breast cancer, which only has a 20 percent survival rate.
As she campaigns beside her husband, John, psychologists are watching to check the impact on her children. Instead of being away from home, should she be mothering these youngsters who may soon lose her. What kind of a mother is she, anyway?
Or is she strong and brave, the epitome of what a woman should be: Standing beside her man instead of trying to steal the show?
Who knows the answers to these questions better than you do?
Try to forget your politics – this is not a Democrat or Republican issue.
This is a woman’s issue.
Share your thoughts and we’ll make sure to share them with Hillary and Elizabeth.

